10-14-2020, 03:57 PM
(10-14-2020, 10:57 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote:
Because, respectfully, your post wasn't worded in a way that easily drew one to that conclusion. Hence my request for clarification.
It isn't intrinsically wrong, no. But, as I stated above, there are numerous changes that would be. IMO stacking the SCOTUS would absolutely be one of them.
Again, it can be. Manipulating the rules or finding loopholes is literally part of the job description for lawyers and politicians.
I honestly think it's because you have no desire to.
So changing the rules isn't wrong. McConnell's obstruction isn't wrong. McConnell is stacking/packing the Supreme Court via obstruction right now as we speak. But, somehow changing the rules to do what McConnell has done through obstruction is somehow wrong? Again, I don't see a far cry difference between stacking/packing the SCOTUS via obstruction or rule change when neither, according to you, are wrong. Some people add the creamer first and the coffee second, others add the coffee first and the creamer second. They're both accomplish the same thing, just different methods of doing the same thing. I don't see one as inherently wrong and not the other. I can honestly say I don't think you have any desire to see it differently for the same reasons you claim I don't.
