A SCOTUS Opening

[GMDino]

(10-27-2020, 10:22 AM)PhilHos Wrote: To be fair, they have no other avenues to attack her. She's intelligent, not ugly, and has plenty of legal experience, though, I guess they could try to argue that she doesn't have enough JUDICIAL experience. But, that'd be hard to do when you're only forms of arguing are relegated to making fun of people. 

She's made some rulings that can lead thinking people to believe that she will make future rulings they don't agree with.  She couldn't answer some basic questions (from Republicans) during her "hearing" and they even limited debate so they could hurry up before the election to force her through.

Her, what can be described as "extreme", religious views are more than fair game just as anyone's would be if they were being put in a position for life.  

Now, none of that means she will do her job poorly or unfairly.  But people having a problem (or "attacking" her as the right likes to say) is relevant.  If she does, however, rule using more of her religion than the constitution there is nothing that can be done so it is worth noting her beliefs.

Bringing up her looks is a very right wing thing to do though.  I wouldn't have expected that from you based on the way you usually post.