A SCOTUS Opening

[*bfine32*]

(10-28-2020, 12:32 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: I’ve seen religion be used as an excuse for many horrible things. And I have plenty of disdain for religion in general. Because she is a she doesn’t exempt her from being a part of that. And because she was in an extreme religious group and forced through onto the scotus makes it even more proper to call it like it is.

You having no problem with a religious extremist on the scotus is pretty shocking. Actually never mind no it isn’t. But if it was an extremist from a different religion I think you would feel differently. I know your high and mighty claim will follow. But my comment stands.

While on the Seventh Circuit, Barrett wrote 79 majority opinions, 4 concurring opinions, and 6 dissenting opinions; yet, every elected Democrat in Washington could not cite one case where her "extreme religious beliefs" caused her to rule conversely to established law. 

Personally I think you're just mad that she got seated and have taken to route of attacking her. But that's just my opinion.