Hunter Biden laptop story

[hollodero]

(10-28-2020, 09:57 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: It is hilarious to watch liberals ignore or lie and say no story about the business dealings of the Biden family while Joe was VP and after his was VP in countries Obama put him in charge of is so hypocritical. Libs accused Trump of doing the same thing Tony Bobulinski just showed the world through emails (he was named in the NY Post email), texts and dates of meetings with Jim, Hunter, Joe (2 times face to face) and Walker the Biden family friend.

Just watch the 45 minute interview on Fox with Tucker Carlson in the 28th of October. The libs believed Vindman, but they want to dismiss war hero Bobulinski. He has tape on tape Walker asking him to not go forward, if so it will destroy people. He only came forward because Adam Schiff in essence called him a traitor and attacked his family name with the Russian collusion narrative used again. He asked family friend Walker to get with Biden family and make Schiff retract the story. If so, he would not go to the media or the senate. They refused and here were are.

That doesn't make much sense though. For one, why would they not give into this blackmail and did instead, as you say, refuse. In your narrative, Bubolinski literally offered them to bury the whole story. This witness is dubious at first glance, starting with him first having met Joe Biden once, then claiming he met him twice. What is it now? Isn't that the one major thing you should get right from the get-go? He also allegedly met with Joe Biden in secret, in a dark LA bar behind a column - yet Biden showed up with his whole security detail? He also, unrelated to meetings, used the line "we went through three years of Russia, Russia, Russia", which is clearly a politically motivated statement that has nothing to do with Biden. Also, this guy accepted an invitation from Trump to sit at the debate, yet what another great way to appear apolitical. He came out at an oddly convenient time for Trump anyway. This is not a particularly trustworthy character witness and nothing he says about Joe Biden seems to be confirmed much.

That his family does business around the world, well, that much seems true, and that much was known. All possible scrutiny coming from that is deserved. The Joe Biden involvement though, this is way too thin. A reference to a "big guy" in an email - that allegedly even gave Hunter a resounding no to his plans - is nothing to hang any serious hat on. Yeah, Bobulinski claims this was Joe Biden. But even FOX news stated that the material he provided show zero evidence of Joe Biden being involved or taking money in any way.

And that's a main difference to Vindman. What he said was supported by many people. Including Donald Trump. Who released the record of his phone call and so pretty much confirmed what Vindman stated. What was left there not to believe?

With Welker's comment, there is no visible connection to Joe Biden whatsoever.

(10-28-2020, 09:57 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: There are a ton of questions including why the FBI sat on the Hunter Biden laptop while the Democrats were trying to impeach the POTUS because he said Biden was corrupt.

That was not why he was impeached though. Trump was impeached for holding back military aid to Ukraine that got approved by Congress, allegedly (but imho, pretty solidly shown) in an attempt to blackmail them into announcing an investigation into the Bidens.

Which of course is one more point that makes me more than sceptical about this story. This is not the first attempt of Trump world to produce something here. They tried it already with the Ukrainian prosecutor that Biden allegedly removed to protect his son - even though pretty much all western governments had the same goal, for said prosecutor was widely known to be corrupt to his bone. And additionally apparently did not even investigate Burisma.

(10-28-2020, 09:57 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: The MSM covered a lie, a Russian collusion narrative where a Russian Dossier paid for by a political opponent (HRC and the DNC) to spy on the Trump campaign and then Trump transition team.

This is not even remotely what happened and even the Barr-led DOJ could not support that narrative.
The FBI "spied" on Carter Page, someone who was on their radar long before the Trump campaign and who according to team Trump (and probably indeed) hardly was involved at all into said campaign. The dossier did not start that process of surveillance of Carter Page. Nor did it start the Russia investigation. That's not according to me, it's actually also according to Devin Nunes.

(10-28-2020, 09:57 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Yet, now they refuse to cover this. The media has shown oit's bias, 92% negativer coverage of Trump for 4 years. but, hey libs love it since they are baby killing morons with no moral compass.

This is not a quality comment. Baby killing morons with no morale? Really? THAT low?