11-09-2020, 03:19 PM
(11-09-2020, 12:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Fred has ignored every fact presented just so he can make his false claims that someone is being sexist.
I have no ignored any facts at all.
And I have not called anyone sexist for criticizing Kamala unless their ONLY criticism is that she is a female.
(11-09-2020, 12:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: He has been presented with 2 simple questions but has refused to answer them because if he does it will shoot down his baseless claims.
I have not refused to answer them. Instead I have pointed out the false implications in the form of the question.
What you are doing is the same as telling someone they can only answer "yes" or "no" to the question "Are you still beating your wife." The only way to answer that question properly is to point out the false implications.
(11-09-2020, 12:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Would Harris be VP elect if she were a male?
This question contains the false implication that a man with the exact same achievements as Kamala would be equally qualified. This is not true because women have to overcome the barriers of sexism to achieve the same goals as men.
(11-09-2020, 12:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: If a person is against women of power why would Amy klobachar be that person's #1 candidate for President in a field of 18-20 other Democrats.
How could I have any idea why you liked Klobacher? It might be because you are sexually attracted to her, or she reminds you of your mother, or some other silly reason like that.
All I know is that you can't stop whining about Biden picking Kamala to be VP "because she is a woman" even though you admit that she is qualified for the job.
