11-10-2020, 05:47 PM
(11-10-2020, 05:41 PM)GMDino Wrote: To the bold...that's why it seems insincere for you to say NOW that you don't mean to suggest being a woman is her only qualification.
He never said that. He did say it was the #1 qualification, which I don't agree with, but he never said it was her only qualification.
Quote:But yeah, calling her a "side piece" was as sexist as calling someone a "handmaiden"...which you would not stand for.
Again, this only holds water if two things are true; 1. that men could not also be someone's "side piece", and 2. that what he was saying wasn't a known fact. Calling someone a handmaiden doesn't meet either of those two criteria.