Kamala's main role

[hollodero]

(11-10-2020, 05:59 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Disparaging, absolutely.  Inherently sexist, no.  That being said I am well aware that successful women are often accused of sleeping their way to the top, which is absolutely sexist if it isn't true.

Also, while it sure is within the realms of possibilities, a man in all likelihood would not get disparaged by being called someone's side piece. It seems like a line of insult that actually indeed is more or less exclusively reserved for women.

Admittedly, I also in general have a hard time to fully accept microsearching Kamala Harris for her early life decisions and going after her over them, after having witnessed four years of Stormy's side piece, who in the eyes of the same Kamala-disparaging people got "attacked so unfairly" by "haters" or "hypocritical" or even "deranged" people for things a thousand times more worrying then if young Kamala had an inappropriate affair.