Kamala's main role

[*bfine32*]

(11-10-2020, 06:58 PM)Lucidus Wrote: I agree with that, however every candidate who runs for POTUS has certain baseline criteria they would use to choose their running mate. That minimum criteria should in no way be held against the person who is chosen, as long as they are considered qualified to fill the position above and beyond said criteria. 

I haven't held the fact that Biden said his selection must be a woman against Harris. 

My first post in the OP was to a poster calling another poster sexist for pointing out she's a woman. 

I simply asserted that Joe made it clear it was his #1 Qualification and that perhaps Joe was the one being sexist.

Since no one could argue with the assertion that Biden eliminating half the selection pool based on nothing other than sex as sexist; they chose to assert I said it was her only criteria, Now when that's been proven to be a lie, they now cling to "You said it was his #1 Qualification"; like that matters.

He said it was a qualification and the only one I'm aware of that he set in stone. 




Quick someone take exception with the phrase set in stone,