11-11-2020, 01:18 PM
(11-11-2020, 12:59 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: This, and 'Zona's, post is solid. Unfortunately you had to sully it with your utterly disprovable "muslim ban" comment. I know that's a pet issue of yours, but it's patently untrue.
Well, not "utterly" disprovable. Trump called for a "shutdown" of Muslims entering the country.
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-35036567
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viDffWUjcBA
And that supports B-zona's insight into the emotional, non-logical appeal of Trump's argumentation.
Were you set to prove he said "shutdown" that one time and that's why "the ban" claim is "patently untrue"?
https://www.cato.org/blog/dozen-times-trump-equated-travel-ban-muslim-ban?
That Trump was mobilizing Islamophobic sentiment in his speeches is the point here.
The re-writings that eventually removed constitutional objections to the letter of the ban as executive order fool few on either side of the aisle regarding its spirit/intent. This is a "pet issue" of millions of Americans who don't want politics and policies founded on scapegoating of minorities.
https://www.nilc.org/issues/immigration-enforcement/understanding-the-muslim-bans/
https://www.aclu-wa.org/pages/timeline-muslim-ban
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/8/us-muslim-ban-set-to-end-on-day-one-of-biden-presidency
https://www.afsc.org/blogs/news-and-commentary/5-things-to-know-about-muslim-ban
LOL Trevor Noah the week of the utterly disprovable ban. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxhGjDyBT30