Kamala's main role

[*PhilHos*]

(11-12-2020, 03:27 AM)fredtoast Wrote: I have repeatedly explained why Biden would have legitimate reasons to select a woman as VP other than being sexist but the conservatives ignore those posts and act like the only possible explanation is sexism.

You can not make this shit up.

(11-12-2020, 03:01 PM)Lucidus Wrote: You continue to assert this notion that Mr. Biden is sexist for establishing the baseline criteria which required his running mate to be of the female persuasion, thereby eliminating male candidates from consideration. However, the simple act of concluding that a female running mate would be more beneficial and advantageous to your ticket does not equate to a sexist act -- either tacitly or overtly. Rather, it's an obvious political calculation; one that all Presidential candidates make when establishing an initial criteria for what type of person would best suit their needs in terms of appealing to the majority of the electorate. Regardless of what criteria is established for a candidate's choice in a running mate, that criteria will invariably create a specific pool and eliminate all that are not part of said pool. There's literally nothing to defend in this case. 

Should be real easy, then, to show where Biden has said his reasons for picking Harris and how it's because of how advantageous her gender would be to the country.