12-02-2020, 08:53 PM
(12-02-2020, 08:00 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Actually that was exactly what was said. A major portion of your original post was nothing but anecdotal evidence from your own experince or that of your friends in law enforcement/probation. But when someone posted a quote from the article you referenced you dismissed it as "unsubstantiated anecdotal evidence"
No I didn't, you're being dishonest. Quote the actual posts if you want to prove it. Which you did not do as you are being dishonest.
Quote:Again that is exactly what you said. In post #1 you said crime was being "excused". In post#3 you used the term "soft on crime". Yet you don't post any evidence that anything like that is happening in Minneapolis.
As usual you are partially quoting to try and make what you'd label a point. You're intentionally disingenuous, as usual.
Quote:So I say something that is not true, but you still feel it is a good point?
As usual you are partially quoting to try and make what you'd label a point. You're intentionally disingenuous, as usual.
Quote:The fact is that the way the police do their job has a lot to do with the crime rate. If they don't do their job then the crime rate goes up.
Sure, but this is different than proactive policing. Evidence that police are not doing their job? Oh wait, you have none.
Quote:It is pretty clear how it is relevant. We have seen it happen before in Baltimore and other places. If anyone dares to criticize the police then they get all pissy and refuse to do their job.
Someone sure sounds like they don't like law enforcement.
Quote:And as a result the crime rate goes up. They punish the public for daring to even suggest the police have done something wrong or need to change the way they do things.
As usual you oversimplify a complicated issue. If you and your buddy didn't drop bait in this forum you'd have half your post count. Try again with some actual substance, you know, like a skyrocketing crime rate. Until then spare us all your usual claptrap.
