Poll: Should an investigation of the prior administration occur?
Yes
No
Unsure
[Show Results]
 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Investigating the prior administration
#15
(12-11-2020, 06:29 PM)hollodero Wrote: Your argument and suggestion seems well thought out and makes a lot of sense - except for that point.

Trump just needs to tweet that Durham is a RINO and an angry democrat and dumb as a rock and a dog and whatever, and most Republicans will fall in line. It does not matter a single bit if there's any consistency of logic behind it. This is an autocratically led party, and so to a large portion of the party, the only single thing that matters is what Trump says. And this will not change, or it already would have.

Romney, on the other hand, won't have a problem with the idea.

Honestly, though, that's fine. Durham was appointed to look at the DoJ in the Obama administration and all these Republicans are on record saying he should be allowed to continue his work. If they turn around and denounce him then it's a win-win for Biden at that point.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Investigating the prior administration - Belsnickel - 12-11-2020, 06:32 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)