12-14-2020, 08:50 PM
It highlights the importance of scheme in the AFCN specifically. The finesse schemes we see in LA, the Saints, and KC, may not work (and thus be weary of the next Offensive minded HC's coming from one of these teams, and a nod to the ideal a HC from the Defensive side may be best afterall) in the AFCN. That's one thing Marvin got right.
I still think Mixon can be worth the money, but we'll need a HC that understands AFCN football. One whose team plays with physicality and poise with a dominant run game, and tough defense.
Where play action actually fools a defense. Instead of the D blowing past the razzle dazzle to sack the QB.
Can you have a physical run team with an elite QB? Or is the ideal that these spread them out offenses are soft inacurate?
I still think Mixon can be worth the money, but we'll need a HC that understands AFCN football. One whose team plays with physicality and poise with a dominant run game, and tough defense.
Where play action actually fools a defense. Instead of the D blowing past the razzle dazzle to sack the QB.
Can you have a physical run team with an elite QB? Or is the ideal that these spread them out offenses are soft inacurate?
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
