Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What do we do if Sewell is gone at 3?
#49
(12-22-2020, 02:29 AM)Bengal Dude Wrote: The Cowboys took their LB at #19, right before the Lions. We had no shot at Vander Esch. 

The whole 2018 draft was weird in that we most likely only take Ragnow at 21, and not if we traded up. The Lions wanted Vander Esch more which is why Dallas stayed at 19 instead of trading back. We would've had to move up to 18, but the Seahawks wanted more than normal to move back, despite them desperately wanting to move back. If they decided to move up to #17, then Vander Esch and Ragnow are both not in consideration because beat guys and even Hobson noted that Marvin, the defensive staff, the scouts, and basically everyone else loved Derwin James would've taken him.

I guess I’m remembering things wrong. My bad. We definitely botched that whole situation though. Should have traded back up or never traded down to begin with. I get that it’s hindsight. We all pushed for the move. I remember someone brought it up on the boards and then on Hobson’s choice, and then they actually made it happen. They were trying so I’ll give them that. Didn’t work out. Oh well.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: What do we do if Sewell is gone at 3? - Bengalstripes9 - 12-22-2020, 03:14 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)