11-02-2015, 04:25 PM
(11-02-2015, 04:17 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: One example would be the use of 'inflammatory' slurs (including images) such as the N word, or any other racial, ethnic or sexual which almost everyone would deem the use of, as purposely derogatory. I hope we can all agree on this.
Outside of that, it would be contingent on the circumstance. Example...someone starts 10 straight threads concerning the same topic. That automatically falls under spamming. Another example...someone does nothing but attack a persons 'personal character'-instead of their positions- for an extended period, which does nothing but interfere with actual conversations. These examples, along with 'slurs', are the most obvious of what will be determined as 'blatant', and could lead to the staff getting involved.
So pretty much, discrimination and whatnot will be tolerated as long as it's not going over the top or using derogatory slurs. Attacks on a person's character will be tolerated as long as there is substance to the thought and not just a spamming barrage of attacks.
Is that correct? IMO, that seems pretty fair for a board solely used for political/religious debate.
