Election Challenges, Protests, Conspiracy Theories, and Moral Panics

[Dill]

(01-21-2021, 02:30 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Yeah, that pesky Bill of Rights, always getting in the way of the "progressive" wish list.

Of course you have, you're in that "progressive" camp.  Trading liberty for safety is fine with you as long as the right party is doing it.

Yes that is one of Tucker's talking points. Seems like you know them ahead of time. 

Another way to say this is that it's fine to trade safety for liberty, as long as the right party is doing it.

(01-21-2021, 02:30 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Everyone has free speech rights, even loons who will buy into the cons and lies of others, who also have free speech rights.  I do appreciate you illustrating in person the desire to limit our rights coming from the "progressive" left.  Always in the name of public safety.  

I thought I was correcting your presentation of AOC and "illustrating" Tucker Carlson's response--he is now, day by day, updating and adapting anti-communism to the post-Trump era. 

Focusing on "white supremacy" is part of that effort--claiming the left/BLM accuse all Trump supporters/defenders of being white supremacists.
This connects to "censorship" and cancel culture, also bad when the other party does it. Maria Baritoromo takes it a step further: the MSM now function as official state media. Totalitarianism is upon us; eliminating ALL our "freedoms" is the goal.


I am thinking of starting a thread on the right's negotiation of the election loss. If I do, your input will be.