Impeachmen' 2: Electoral Boogaloo

[*michaelsean*]

(02-10-2021, 11:05 AM)Au165 Wrote: No, because the constitution very narrowly defines it and many constitutional law experts have already said that a very narrow definition would not apply here. Armed insurrection does not fall under it unless it is in some sort of conjunction or conspiracy with enemies of the United States.

You can read the case law from Marshall that pretty much defined it. People were conspiring to overthrow the government but they did not actually attempt it. That’s why they weren’t guilty of treason. Not because no enemies were involved. The constitution specifically says levying war as one way and adhering to enemies as a second way.