Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is the fact that AJ Mccarron hasn't been traded yet maddening to anyone else?
#41
(02-28-2017, 12:53 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: Couldn't disagree with this more. 

Dalton rarely gets injured. When he did get a freak injury, Mccarron did a decent job filling in but lets be honest, we weren't going to the Super Bowl with him. The same way the Steelers weren't going to the Super Bowl with Landry Jones. 

Why not get a decent trade pick so you can get a guy that can help your team RIGHT NOW and fill in ACTUAL holes on your team rather than over valuing a freaking backup QB who statistic probability shows wont even play a snap this season. 

Quote: I would rather have a better chance to win next year than taking a second round guy who might get to play in 3-4 years. If he's lucky.

Backup QB is still a necessary role... sometimes. It's like my Gatling gun. It's better to have and not need, than to need and not have.

Plus, the odds of us taking someone in the second that's going to go play in front of all the other 1-3 round picks the last few years that are seeing sparse playing time isn't high.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Is the fact that AJ Mccarron hasn't been traded yet maddening to anyone else? - Benton - 02-28-2017, 01:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)