03-22-2018, 02:34 PM
(03-22-2018, 01:22 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I would too but you and I know how these extensions work...they'll get addressed sometime after the draft and before the regular season starts.
True.
(03-22-2018, 01:39 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Another caveat of Hunt doing better statistically than Willis (although he really didn't)...
Hunt played 576 snaps.
Willis played only 360 snaps. Over 200 less.
Their difference in production?
Hunt = 19 tackles, 1.0 sack, 2 PDs, 1 blocked kick
Willis = 25 tackles, 1.0 sack
Will Clarke also...
Clarke had 313 snaps (fewer than both Hunt and Willis)
15 tackles, 2.5 sacks, 1 FR, 1 PD
Overall though, it's a rookie vs players who were in their 4th (Clarke) and 5th (Hunt) years.
Jordan Willis still has more upside than both of the other guys for that reason.
Great post Ocho, thanks for this. Thought so, as you said those guys were in their 4th and 5th years and it is pretty much a wash.
Way more upside with Willis and like i said he was not near as good as i expected him to be as a rookie. He will improve i am sure
of it and be that MJ replacement we will be needing. He was good at both rushing the passer and stopping the run in college.
Unlike Lawson who is purely a pass rusher at this point, all be it a damn good one.
