04-20-2020, 05:00 PM
(04-20-2020, 04:18 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I probably should have just limited it to 3 years rather than 4. 10 years would only be a good window if you limited it to just the first 3-4 years of their careers, because Mixon is only 3 years in. Instead you're comparing players who had the decline of their career already to a guy who hasn't.
Maybe you should look at some numbers instead of just talking out your ass.
If I limit the production to just the first three seasons of their career then only ONE second round running back (Eddie Lacey) has been more productive than Mixon over the last decade.
