Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake
#1
Since 2000, Zac is the 11th coach to have 5 or less wins in each season of his first 2 full seasons.

Of the previous 10, 6 were fired after their 2nd year was finished, and 2 were fired during their 3rd season.

The only 2 that lasted beyond their 3rd year were Capers with the expansion Texans, and Bradley with the Jags. Neither had any winning seasons or lasted past a 4th year. 

Even if you're generous and expand it to 6 wins or less in each of a coaches first 2 full seasons (which happened 24 times), it's only slightly better and that's because of Kyle Shanahan, who made it to a SB in year 3, but still has 3 losing seasons in 4 years...and Norv Turner, who lasted 7 years with the Redskins and had 3 winning seasons. The overall results are still very depressing.

This is why - IMO and despite the last 2 games - bringing Zac back is going to be a mistake, even though it's obvious he will be back. It just doesn't work out. 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Bengalholic - 12-30-2020, 04:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)