Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake
#79
See, you say this:

(12-31-2020, 09:34 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: Maybe your definition of shit football is different than mine. If you cant win a playoff game you are playing shit football. Marvin Lewis coached us  for 15 years without winning a playoff game, That is SHIT! I am so tired of being happy we made the playoffs only to get knocked out the first game. I was so happy as were many on here to hire someone outside the organization. I just want to give that person a chance.
If you fire him after 2 seasons what coach in their right mind would want this job knowing the Bengals front office history? If you don't make the playoffs in 2 years we are looking for another coach mentality is the wrong mentality. If ZT does not show improvement next year which I feel he will then they can get rid of him. Improvement to me would be around 8-8 and competing in all of your games.

But also this:

(12-31-2020, 09:06 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: 2. One of the teams he beat has a 12-3 record. He did not beat them the first game of the year he beat them when they were sting to win their division. Oh, by the way when was the last time we beat the Steelers on Prime Time Monday Night Football. Hell I would keep him around as long s he beats the Steelers every year.

And so I'm still kinda confused. Beating the Steelers isn't any better than going 10-6 and losing in the wildcard game. I'd argue it's maybe more fun to make the playoffs instead of winning a pointless game at the end of the season. But either way, it was time for ML to go (and it was some years before he did) and it's time for ZT to go.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - MileHighGrowler - 12-31-2020, 09:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)