01-30-2021, 05:11 AM
(01-29-2021, 06:42 PM)psychdoctor Wrote: This post is not for everyone; but I am asking for you input.
As casual fans and aspiring fantasy GM, sometimes we try to improve team via FA, draft, and coaching changes; but at close inspection, it seems more complicated.
I was thinking if we were to use a scientific approach to improve team performance, maybe we can identify ways or variables that would lead the Bengals to a championship season; at least in theory.
Let's say there are 4 independent variables; two are static (unchangeable) and two are dynamic (changeable). The independent variable is what influences outcome. Therefore, the 4 IV would be:
Team Organization (ownership, money spent, training facilities) unfortunately this is static,
Coaching (play calls, schemas, best-fit use of players) dynamic,
Team Composition (chemistry, formal role usage, team fit, team leaders) dynamic, and
Talent, this is static.
I have Talent separate because talent is a stable construct and is considered innate whereas team comp is dynamic and changes. It would seem to draft the best talent works best. Would you add to any of the IV?
The problem I am having is at the dependent variable. The dependent variable could be game outcome or wins. The problem of using "wins" as a dependent variable is other factors influence game outcome like weather, chance, injuries, and officials. Also, winning the Superbowl is viewed as the ultimate goal but winning the Superbowl rarely occurs for most teams so maybe not the best measure. The Mike Brown "being competitive" doesn't work because you cannot measure a competitive variable with consistency. What does "competitive" mean? Does it mean losing close games? So are wins the best way to measure team's progress? Is talent more important than meeting team needs in the draft?
Also, I am Curious; what percent (%) do you place on team needs vs. Talent when you conduct Mock Draft Simulation?
Some would consider a draft pick a "homerun" if the BPA is at team's highest need. But what if it is a weak draft at team need? Shouldn't you just select the best talent?
There is no rocket science to this. If Penie Sewell is there, Bengals need to take him. He is The Best Available Player if he is still on board and he fills The Weakest Need. Protection for our Franchise QB coming back from major knee surgery caused by no blocking. People that will come on here talking WR or Edge Rusher don't know a darn thing about football. If the big Samoan Outland Trophy Winner is still there when Bengals pick, Take Him. ...The Bengals are very close to having Burrow end up another GREG COOK top pick career injury if they don't get some real talent on O Line.
Sewell will be the Best Player On The Board if there and Fills The Biggest Need. It Is Not Rocket Science.
1968 Bengal Fan
