Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bengals Insiders Don’t Have Us Taking Pitts
#53
(02-10-2021, 09:35 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Assuming that Sewell is gone at 5...

I would rather have Chase + Ertz (or Henry) than just Pitts.

Eagles are going to either trade or cut Ertz (and maybe take Pitts themselves?), and either he or Hunter Henry would be a good add in FA. I would give a 2021 4th or a 2022 3rd for Ertz in a trade if he was willing to agree a 2 year extension (on top of his 1 year he already is under contract), if it meant not having to bid for him in FA. Whatever he will make, you can basically offset $5.2m of it by cutting Uzomah.

Add 2 real good OL in FA, add 1 OL with your 2nd round pick, add Chase with your 1st round pick, and add either Ertz or Henry and you have an offense that can easily keep pace with literally anyone in the league. Won't matter if your defense can't stop the run, because the opposing team won't be able to run the ball while down three scores.

Well in this case yeah, I take Chase. Smirk
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Bengals Insiders Don’t Have Us Taking Pitts - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 02-12-2021, 03:46 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)