07-06-2021, 04:25 PM
(07-06-2021, 12:42 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: This reminds me of when Anti-Vaxxers use VAERS data to claim the COVID vaccines are killing people.
The thinking is:
1. Person A takes Vaccine.
2. Person A dies.
3. <Missing evidence that there is any link>
4. Therefore, the vaccine must have caused the death.
no evidence beyond the vague link that lacks context (millions of people who take the vaccine didn't die, and also there's no evidence that the vaccine caused any of those deaths in any way).
Calling this a Clinton murder follows that same conspiratorial thinking.
1. Person A did something to the Clintons.
2. Person A dies.
3. <Missing evidence that there is any link>
4. Therefore, the Clintons must have caused the death.
Except they usually make up #3, most of which is utterly ridiculous.
For instance - if the Clinton's could make people commit suicide, why didn't Hilary run against nothing but 3rd party candidates in 2016? I mean, this shady cabal she runs can apparently make anyone - no matter how high profile - suddenly die. Why not do that to political opponents?
