10-17-2021, 06:19 PM
(10-17-2021, 06:01 PM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: Calling one a generational talent like most people did is pretty big leap. Meanwhile you actually have a generational talent on our team like Chase. He’s in the conversation on every statistic for greatest start along with HOF Randy Moss.
Not sure what you mean by bad take, but A bad take is we should have taken a LT when we already had a solid one.
Saying a guy is a generational prospect doesn't imply that he will kill it from day 1.
Yes, Chase is great. I love Chase. He's looking like the right pick, if I'm being honest.
Thing is, I don't like when people act like they predicted Sewell would bust when they really didn't, and nobody thought Chase would be THIS good from jump, either. Most pegged him for around 900 yards this year in the stat prediction thread.
People are salty over the long debate we had, so they're acting like they made predictions that they really didn't, and also slapping a bust label on a guy after 5 (now 6) games.
That's what I meant by "bad takes".
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
