03-08-2022, 11:45 PM
(03-08-2022, 11:37 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: WRs drafted at 20, 27, 34, 49, 56, 57, 59, 77, 82, 85, 89, and 91 didn’t match Boyd’s production.
Only three rookie WRs drafted in the first 3 rounds last year matched or exceeded Boyd’s production and one of them was drafted by the Bengals.
And your point is the WR3 had less production than WR1 and WR2 in Chase and Higgins? That’s a real news flash. I have a suspicion Wan’dale would have less production than those two, also.
"And your point is the WR3 had less production than WR1 and WR2 in Chase and Higgins? That’s a real news flash. I have a suspicion Wan’dale would have less production than those two, also."
Exactly my point, it isnt necessarily Boyds fault we have 2 superior receivers and he is underutilized as to his talent, it's his position, thus he is more valuable to us by providing a draft pick and his $10M than his 28 yds per game in the playoffs . (J24 credit on the stat)
Would you rather have had Boyd in the SB or a $10M RG and Trent Taylor in the slot?
