03-09-2016, 03:54 PM
Again, I'm not comparing the two because their situations were not the same. You can't just look at their stats and make a direct comparison. That is why I'm arguing that if LaFell can't be productive on New England, he's going to be far less productive in Cincinnati. Thus, we shouldn't sign him unless it's a great deal.
Sanu was, at-best, the 4th option on a run-heavy team (Bengals were 26th in the NFL in passing attempts).
LaFell, was the 3rd option (higher when Edelman and Amendola were out) for a pass-heavy team (Pats were 5th in the NFL in passing attempts).
Sanu was, at-best, the 4th option on a run-heavy team (Bengals were 26th in the NFL in passing attempts).
LaFell, was the 3rd option (higher when Edelman and Amendola were out) for a pass-heavy team (Pats were 5th in the NFL in passing attempts).
