06-23-2015, 01:47 PM
(06-23-2015, 01:44 PM)GodFather Wrote: Shake the term "Arguing for the sake of arguing" comes to mind on half of his posts. It's a button pusher thing. If you said what he did, then his reply would be the complete opposite point of view. :snark:
He's about to cry because what you just posted can't be factually proven.
Then he's going to cry about this post of mine because it can't be factually proven either. It's like a never ending paradox of conjecture and strawman arguments! Oh noes!!!
