09-01-2016, 08:13 AM
I've been thinking about this over the past few days, and I've come to realize... what does it matter who the backup QB is? I'm being totally serious.
It's always, "If _________ goes down, we will need ___________!"
Will we though? Does it really matter? For what reason?
If your primary QB goes down with injury, the season is likely screwed.
That's just the bottom line. It doesn't matter if it's McCarron...it's not Dalton.
This doesn't necessarily refer to just the Bengals...it's everybody, the entire NFL.
If you HAVE to rely on your backup, you will not win the Super Bowl.
Sure, McCarron (and others) will do enough to get you into the playoffs...but that's it.
I just don't understand the thinking:
1) Your great backup gets you to the playoffs where you lose first round (bad draft pick) or...
2) Your average backup gets you nowhere and you get a decent or great draft pick.
My point is...a McCarron isn't going to beat a Brady in a Super Bowl, so who cares who's #2?
It's always, "If _________ goes down, we will need ___________!"
Will we though? Does it really matter? For what reason?
If your primary QB goes down with injury, the season is likely screwed.
That's just the bottom line. It doesn't matter if it's McCarron...it's not Dalton.
This doesn't necessarily refer to just the Bengals...it's everybody, the entire NFL.
If you HAVE to rely on your backup, you will not win the Super Bowl.
Sure, McCarron (and others) will do enough to get you into the playoffs...but that's it.
I just don't understand the thinking:
1) Your great backup gets you to the playoffs where you lose first round (bad draft pick) or...
2) Your average backup gets you nowhere and you get a decent or great draft pick.
My point is...a McCarron isn't going to beat a Brady in a Super Bowl, so who cares who's #2?
