09-02-2016, 05:23 PM
(09-02-2016, 05:17 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Nate has it right.
Why do they have to do either? The Bengals had 4 RB last year and many years previously and they were perfectly fine.
They don't have to go short on WR or OL, because their plan had always been to go 4 RB. It was going to be Peerman, then he broke his arm and it was going to Carson. Instead you just give it to Herron.
Not sure why you're trying to overthink it or make this way harder than it needs to be, Sunset. It's just a straight RB for RB swap roster-wise. Lol
For some reason I was thinking that they were going to only keep 3 RB, because of injuries at TE were forcing them to keep 4 TE.
Wasn't trying to be deliberately obtuse, just was having trouble remembering how many of each position they typically keep.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
