08-01-2017, 03:49 PM
(07-31-2017, 07:26 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: That sounds like a pretty good scenario, except for on thing..
If a solid, veteran OL is on the roster bubble, why would the Bengals give up a player for him? If he's a vet, and good, he's likely on the bubble because he costs so much more than the up and comer that is going to replace him. Why not just wait for said vets to get cut, and hire them for less?
Never said a vet. Very well could be a guy still on his rookie contract, like Hill. Plus, if the guy is subject to waivers, then we have 8 teams in front of us who could take him.
You can always trust an dishonest man to be dishonest. Honestly, it's the honest ones you have to look out for.
"Winning makes believers of us all"-Paul Brown
"Winning makes believers of us all"-Paul Brown
