10-12-2017, 12:34 PM
(10-11-2017, 11:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Kroft receptions first 2 years in the league: 21
Gresh receptions first 2 years in the league: 108
Tyler Kroft in 2017: 14 catches for 139 yards and 2 TDs on 17 targets
Jermaine Gresham: 12 catches for 90 yards and 0 TDs on 18 targets
Tyler Kroft contract: 2 years and 1.37 million remaining (including 2017)
Jermaine Gresham contract: 4 years and 28 million
Tyler Kroft is much more productive and way cheaper.
Why should we want Gresh again?
(10-12-2017, 12:25 AM)Synric Wrote: So your narrative is even though he's this amazing receiving TE Arizona just refuses to use him that way...he then resigned in ARZ to be ill used as a receiver.
That makes me chuckle.
Exactly. If Gresh were such a talented receiver, he'd be a fool to sign in a place that lowers his value. Twice.
(10-12-2017, 12:31 AM)Synric Wrote: Andy Dalton is one of very QBs to throw for 3000+ yards 20+ TDs in hist first 3 years. He's one of what very few QBs to take his team to the playoffs 5 times in a row.
You seem to call him a mediocre QB alot lol. Just saying pot kettle man.
Dalton holds every meaningful season record in franchise history and is now 3rd in Bengals history in passing yards. Clearly he's a talented QB.
(10-12-2017, 02:26 AM)The Caped Crusader Wrote: Funny how people defend Gresham quicker than Dalton...
Ain't it? I've always found it funny that some of the same people who vigorously defend Marvin, Gresh or a mediocre RB like Ced Benson take the opposite side on Dalton (and Palmer).
Dalton and Palmer are better at their positions than any of those guys were at their's. Not to mention talent at QB is harder to find than talent at any of those positions.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
