11-20-2017, 01:27 AM
(11-20-2017, 01:00 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Hell you are right. He did almost have 160 yards passing which is basically MVP stuff. 5 less INTs than Nathan Peterman today too. And he directed us to only 8 less first downs than the Brock Osweiler led offense we faced.
My bad. We are extremely lucky to have a QB who can direct such a prolific offensive display. Sorry i ever expected more from our QB.
Nobody said he played like an MVP today. Just that he's a worthy game ball candidate. You attacked my choice, so I'm giving you my reasoning.
Btw...CBS seems to agree with me:
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-week-11-grades-collapsing-chiefs-get-a-d-vikings-get-an-a-for-throttling-rams/
Quote:The Bengals can pretty much thank Andy Dalton for the win. Although he didn't put up big numbers, he did come through in the clutch. The Bengals QB threw 3 TD passes -- even though he only completed 15 passes the entire game -- and he also helped Cincy's offense convert 7 of 15 third downs, including two on one drive late in the 4th quarter when the Bengals were desperately trying to burn the clock.
I guess John Breech of CBS sports is an Andy fanboy. With that, I'm 100% done with this thread. I just wanted to defend my choice, not take the thread over.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
