08-15-2015, 05:17 PM
(08-14-2015, 05:43 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: I really can't believe that he can't comprehend that.
The entire franchise moved to Baltimore, but since another one, which was built from scratch and had no ties to the old franchise, took on the same name in the same location, they somehow get to keep the titles?
As I explained in a previous post, yes.
Look at it this way: when a player gets cut, traded, or leaves via free agency, nothing he does from that point forward is associated with his former team., right? What the NFL essentially did with the 'old' Browns was to cut the ENTIRE team - even the owners. This allowed for two things to happen: the 'cut' personnel formed a new team, and the team that was 'formed from scratch' was hired to be the 'new' Browns.
Can you comprehend that?
