Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Did Andy have the worst offensive supporting cast?
#14
(02-22-2018, 10:30 PM)Go Cards Wrote: We will just have to agree to disagree then. 

Working and do not have time to debate. but believe the bad throws you are referencing when he did have time was because he so rarely had time that he was hearing phantom footsteps. 

Who wouldn't after the pressure usually arrived before he could look at his second read. 

Plus one sets up the other and there was no rushing attack at all even though they have good rbs

I don’t completely disagree with you. I think the line was, in a general sense, below avg. to bad. I also think that Andy Dalton was, in a general sense, below average to bad. The line had a few good to ok games and so did Andy Dalton - both had horrible, awful games or moments as well. Those two things didn’t necessarily go hand in hand, either. Sometimes when the line was fine, Dalton struggled. Even the line was bad, sometimes Dalton was fine. The footsteps thing I don’t have any sympathy for. He’s the highest paid guy playing the most important position. It’s fair to expect excellence and for him to have nerves of steel. As the saying goes.... No pressure, no diamonds.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Did Andy have the worst offensive supporting cast? - PDub80 - 02-22-2018, 11:28 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)