Thread Rating:
  • 9 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Driskel should be starter next year
(12-17-2018, 10:20 PM)Synric Wrote: If you actually read the article that is from a blogger Brickwallblitz the link is in the first few paragraphs.
He also says Ryan Tannwhile is a top 5 QB lol.



This is from pro football focus 2017. Dalton had a 90 passer rating on deep balls in 2017 and a 95 passers-by rating from 2011 to 2016.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/fantasy-football-metrics-that-matter-deep-ball-qbs?utm_source=cj&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_campaign=cjaff&cjevent=7a8d424c026211e982ae00730a24060e

Try again.

 Who cares about his qb rating on deep balls. YOU CAN'T USE QB RATING FOR DEEP BALLS. It isn't accurate.

You can throw a deep ball 50 yards for a TD and get a 158 rating. Another 50 yard deep ball at the one yard line gives you a 118 rating. The difference that each throw produces is 0.3 points yet there's a huge difference in qb rating of 40 points. 

Do you understand the logic of that because if you don't just lurk back to your cave. 

Dalton threw 3 for 16 2 TD and had a qb rating of 105. 3 for 16 is terrible on deep throws. It scored high because a couple of those were TD's

It would be nice if theyd give the whole list, but they didn't.

https://ftw.usatoday.com/2018/03/nfl-most-accurate-quarterbacks-pro-football-focus-pff-stats-tom-brady-kirk-cousins
If I win the lottery I'll spend half the money on alcohol, gambling and wild women. The other half I'll waste. 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Driskel should be starter next year - wolverine515151 - 12-17-2018, 10:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)