The New "Ginger Genius"

[*bfine32*]

(08-20-2019, 03:52 PM)PDub80 Wrote: Only morons argue semantics and cannot connect obvious dots. This isn't a contract negotiation or court of law. It's a conversation. I clearly meant make the playoffs, win playoff games, and then win the Superbowl.

You mouth breathers are grossly wrong, so instead of swallowing whatever pride you pretend to have you inststead try and appear right by taking something out of context (only looking at one game when it takes many) to try and make yourselves feel better. That's called Straw man and it's argumentative baby talk.

Here's why I'm right on your take on this.... YOU also didn't list the games leading up to the Superbowl. In your fictional, made up, literal stories where one guy shows up and magically wins the Superbowl playing like trash, you're right. But, in reality, the Bengals have to win many games, several in a row, and poor QB play doesn't allow for that. And, even if it did, enjoy your 2 exceptions you found out of 50+ games. 

Keep wishing in one hand and crapping in the other. You're starting to get stinky.

No need for the name calling, but I get you point. You suggested you cannot win a Superbowl with bad QB play and others provided you examples of good QBs having a bad game in the Super Bowl. Most can see that is not the same thing.

Now Trent Dilfer might be an exception, but he is the exception, not the rule