Bullock is the Devil

[*ochocincos*]

(09-10-2019, 11:33 AM)Au165 Wrote:
..Catanzaro was 85% on extra points last year. They are basically the same guy, but I need those XP to not be so unreliable. Everyone here wants to trade one dude for another dude when they are all the same dude. The league has a massive kicking problem, the fact people think we can just go grab a better kicker when the Bears/Vikings/Falcons/Jets have been trying all off season to get one even remotely capable is as funny as thinking we'd find a LT walking around on the streets to save us.

Since 2017, Catanzaro has had 5 XP misses (59 for 64) with a 92% completion.
In that same span, Bullock has had 4 XP misses (70 for 74) with a 94% completion.

If adding up the total number of misses under 40 yards between FGs and XPs, they have both missed the same number.
However, Catanzaro hasn't missed from 50+ yards since 2017 (5 for 5) while hitting a 59 yarder and 57 yarder.
Bullock, in the same timeframe, has a 50% FG % on 50+ yards since 2017 (3 for 6) with a long of 51.


Personally, I'd be fine with my kicker missing an extra shorter kick or two if it means hitting from further out more often, but that's just me.