Polian: Questioning Bengals playoff success "absurd"

[djs7685]

(05-19-2015, 04:17 PM)bfine32 Wrote: No doubt, you "debunked' a lot of things that were not stated.

Good Job

Are you trying to sound dopey intentionally here or not? It really seems that you're trying hard

YOU brought up being favored. Your insinuation is that it's not so bad that the Bengals lost since they weren't favored, is that correct or do I have that wrong?

My point is simply that you have no idea what the **** you're talking about by bringing up odds because, according to Vegas, the Bengals weren't supposed to get blown out since they covered the spread in a total of ZERO playoff games.

You're trying to use them not being favored as a pat on the back to Marvin and the organization when in reality, if you knew anything about gambling, football isn't just about being favored or not. There's a point spread that you obviously know nothing about.

Don't bring up shit that you're clueless on. I'm sure you won't listen to that advice though like the stubborn "Switzerland" that you are.

Stop trying to claim those things weren't stated by you. The second you brought up being favored, everything dealing with odds comes into play. I'm sorry that you're just so clueless when it comes to what YOU brought up that you just can't comprehend it.