10-10-2019, 02:10 PM
(10-09-2019, 08:11 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Serious question. What about that PFF rating below 70, that claims Hopkins is among the NFL's best? Do all Centers just suck in general? I thought I remembered you saying that anything below 70 was pretty much "bad".
Pistons seems to be avoiding your serious question Sunset.
(10-09-2019, 08:36 PM)psychdoctor Wrote: Similarly, has any player obtained higher 90s? Or are the scaling weighted by social comparison which prevent this? What do the numbers mean? Is the score 70 on a standardized bell-shape curve where 70 is the mean? Does 70-80 have the same ratio in terms of variance and probability as 80-90. The reason i say this is if more frequent scores are in the 70-80 range, then just using probability, the 10-20 scores would be infrequent and the 90 and above scores would be infrequent. You can be the best QB in the world ever and not score consistently in the 90s or even reach 100. If that is the case being that the best QB ever and cannot consistently achieve the best or toward the best scores, what do these scores mean?
Good questions.
