Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"We're not trading that guy"
#29
(10-10-2019, 06:08 PM)psychdoctor Wrote: This is what happens you have have a young idealistic coach that sees the Bengals as a 3-2 team and not 0-5.  His assessment is based on potential so that it supports the confirmation bias that things are working.  

Things are NOT working and changes need to be made.  

Dalton is not the answer at QB now and Dalton will not be the answer in the future.  Jonah Williams is a unknown and fans do not know what he brings under Turner.  The O-Line and backers and apparently the secondary are a mess.  The team does not have sound fundamentals and there is no gap integrity by either line.  

If Taylor were to realistically assess the Bengals, and wants to win, he needs to have an understanding of core players and how to look in the future so that the team can win.  Dalton and Green are not the future and are past their prime.  

There are only three players on the team that are keepers in my eyes and that is Mixon, Bates, and Boyd.  Maybe WJ3, and he has regressed.  Maybe Hopkins but he gets no push at LOS.  I like Billings but I do not know if he is part of the core.  The rest are expendable.

This is also likely why the front office won't go 'all in' in free agency. They'll think that injuries did us in. They'll think that a staff with another year will make us better.

That said, the PFF rankings clearly show that nearly every player has gotten worse than last year. Putting AJ Green out there has nothing to do with how bad the defense looks. They've give up the most yards in franchise history through 5 games.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
"We're not trading that guy" - pally - 10-10-2019, 05:10 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - Okeana - 10-10-2019, 08:06 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - JSR18 - 10-12-2019, 12:24 AM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - J24 - 10-10-2019, 06:30 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - THE PISTONS - 10-10-2019, 09:43 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-10-2019, 08:58 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 08:27 AM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 02:09 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 02:33 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 08:20 AM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - Synric - 10-10-2019, 09:39 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - Synric - 10-11-2019, 07:29 AM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - HuDey - 10-11-2019, 12:42 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 05:28 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 06:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)