Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"We're not trading that guy"
#32
(10-10-2019, 09:47 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Usually agree with you but Mixon is definitely not a dime a dozen player. No way. Yawn

I think most of the reason Bates has been invisible is communication just isn't there yet for some reason. Ballhawk and when
it rains it pours, he will get his, it is only his second year Geez. Boyd is our best player right now by far, we just need to use our
other players better...

More 2 TE sets to help out the OL, more of Mixon and Gio on the field at the same time, less 3 WR sets with rookies etc.

The problem with more 2 TE sets is that Boyd is the only WR that can get open. Now, IF/WHEN Green comes back...that's a different story.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
"We're not trading that guy" - pally - 10-10-2019, 05:10 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - Okeana - 10-10-2019, 08:06 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - JSR18 - 10-12-2019, 12:24 AM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - J24 - 10-10-2019, 06:30 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-10-2019, 08:58 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 08:27 AM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 02:09 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 02:33 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 08:20 AM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - Synric - 10-10-2019, 09:39 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - Synric - 10-11-2019, 07:29 AM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - THE PISTONS - 10-10-2019, 11:31 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - HuDey - 10-11-2019, 12:42 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 05:28 PM
RE: "We're not trading that guy" - jason - 10-11-2019, 06:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)