01-04-2020, 08:42 PM
(01-04-2020, 10:40 AM)Daddy-O Wrote: IMO Findlay's sacks had little to nothing to do with pocket presence and everything to do with inexperience. Dalton is very decisive and quick to get rid of the ball. Findlay had not developed that yet (or maybe never would) so it led to sacks.
This is a silly discussion because it seems people assume if you are pro Burrow that you are anti Dalton. For me that is the farthest from the truth, I actually like AD and have stood up for him on these boards. But the Bengals have the #1 pick and just so happen they need to develop a young QB to rebuild the franchise. Ding, Joe Burrow is the best QB prospect in the draft. Dalton is older and at the end of his contract.
This isn't about comparisons, it's just pure common sense.
(01-04-2020, 11:03 AM)BengalsRocker Wrote: ^This
I can want Burrow and still not be anti-Dalton.
Just the same as I can refrain from trashing on Dalton for the most part and not be a Dalton Gang person.
Dalton is what he is. Good Andy. Bad Andy.
As a team we need a change and this is the right alignment for the QB position.
Whether it's retaining Dalton and transitioning to Burrow or just ripping the band aid off and putting the rookie out there next season.
It needs to happen.
This is a message to other posters. STOP TRYING TO DIVIDE THE FAN BASE!
There are a few outlier posters who hate Dalton and on the other side that want to defend him to the end.
You know who you are.
For the most part fans want the best QB so if parting ways with Andy then so be it.
Well said, always liked Dalton but Burrow is who we need to move on to.
Nothing against Dalton. I am in no Dalton Gang and even Bfine will say so.
It is time, the timing couldn't be better IMO.
(01-04-2020, 12:47 PM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: Imagine how dominant Tua Tagovailoa could have been if he hadn’t been held back by that talentless overrated hack Nick Saban.
Yeah, that hack held him back.
