05-10-2020, 12:36 PM
(05-10-2020, 11:08 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Nice opinion, but not factual
Wrong.
All-Pro is more elite than Pro-Bowl. That is a fact.
The Pro-Bowl roster had 44 guys, from the AFC alone, in it. That is 88 total, before injury replacements come in. It is a top 90 club.
Further, it IS a popularty contest, as fans have gotten a vote. Since 1995 anyway. Fans, coaches, and players each get 33% of the vote.
The all-pro team is MUCH more select. One player at each spot. And some flex spots/specialists, depending on the outlet. These are media selections (AP, Sporting News, PFWA). AP has a second team, but even then, we are talking half the size of a Pro-Bowl team.
Warford has never made All-Pro, but has been a Pro-Bowler, last year as a replacement.
Last 3 PFF grades: 73.1 (2019), 66.5 (2018), 69.7 (2017).
Our guys last year:
Jordan 43.7 (though I read somewhere he graded out at 35 in games 1-8 and over 70 in 9-16: playing more games in the first half);
Hopkins: 62.4
Su'a-Filo: 60.1
Redmond: 50.6
Price: 41.8
(Miller: 58.6)
At tackle:
J. Williams (no rating)
Hart: 57.7
F. Johnson: 62.6 (basically 1 game)
(Glenn: 68.4)
(Jerry: 55.6)
(Smith 51.0)
Jason Peters 82.4
