07-20-2020, 05:37 PM
(07-20-2020, 04:59 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Would these be the same "teams of lawyers" who said Federal agents were not bound by California's SB 54 Sanctuary Bill?
Maybe? Maybe not?
Quote:Why do we even need a Supreme Court if Federal Law Enforcement policy never violate the constitution?
A silly question, especially given the words I specifically used. There is always debate over the constitutionality of certain laws. The SCOTUS is the final arbiter of this. But what you're suggesting is occurring, based solely on unverified statements from unvetted people, is so blatantly unconstitutional as to be obvious on its face. So maybe, just maybe, these people were actually arrested for something instead of nothing?
Then again, you are defending vigilante murders while excoriating law enforcement. Quite the bizarro world we currently reside in.
