LE Leaks show treatment of pro BLM protestors vs conservative militias

[Dill]

(07-21-2020, 01:23 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: There's clearly a lot you "don't see".

Case in point.  You misspelled vigilante thug murderers again btw.

Ahh, what you're describing is commonly known as an "investigation".  See, I have no experience in such manners, much like firearms, so I will bow to the expertise of Fred and yourself.  Alternatively you could watch the video I provided, read the news articles I posted and realize that dead bodies don't materialize out of thin air.

Ohhhh, is that what is happening in this thread, waiting for a "full picture" before we render a verdict?  Your posts, and those of other users, made me think otherwise.

Sure, except for the ones that did.

I see, you're under the impression that armed vigilantes roaming the streets gunning down those they determine to be dangerous is legal homicide.  I'll be sure to make note of this.

I didn't post sources?  I didn't cite facts?  You might have a more credible argument if you didn't post such obviously incorrect assertions.

Based on dead people killed by vigilantes?  Or is your assertion that that kid killed himself?  Keep defending George Zimmerman, Dill.  The intellectual disconnect is entertaining at the very least.

This is mostly quipery. But I'll respond to the bolded.

It's a long ways from "Dead bodies don't materialize out of thin air" to "vigilantes murdered innocent people in Seattle." That's why I want to see a reported reconstruction of who fired shots at whom, for what reason before jumping to conclusions.

You frequently present yourself as a law enforcement expert, someone who should know about investigating before concluding, so I have been asking you to fill in the gaps with something more than single statement unsourced claims.  You've not done that.

Rather, you've demanded I jump to your conclusions. An "anti-vigilante" who won't even wait for the police investigation, much less the courts?

When asked for linkage between a Far Left Security Force (your term) and the Seattle shootings, you just posted a link which said people were shot, nothing about any Far left Security Force.   No one was asking for proof people were shot. Then you posted a video which was pretty hard to follow. I heard shots but didn't see anyone shooting anything. That's you "posting facts" when not relying on unsourced claims.

Then again, it was Fred who took the time to sort out what could or could not be securely gleaned from the video. Not you.

Did "armed vigilantes" determine that people were "dangerous" because they were shooting at innocent bystanders, as well as the vigilantes? Were they shooting in self defense?  Nothing posted so far has given me a secure answer to that question. 

Fred, can you help again?