Opinion: DeSantis 2024?

[Dill]

(10-29-2022, 01:59 PM)BengalYankee Wrote: Why waste my time Dill and lie???

I asked please send me links where she liked applause from "MAGA" crowds shouting "lock her up".

If you are going to continue to lie with fake links then I won't respond yo you.

As for as your links, Tulsi is no longer a Democrat and can appear or endorse "Republican" candidates. 

I sometimes think my fellow posters are "lying," but I never accuse them of that. In absence of proof, I remain silent rather than
launch accusations based on impressions; If I have proof then I post it in the form of statements which contradict one another. Let the evidence speak.

I told you that Gabbard is now speaking before "lock her up" MAGA crowds and enjoying their applause. The claim is not that the crowds were shouting "lock her up" while Gabbard was speaking. "locker her up" functions as an adjective to describe the type of crowd--a rowdy Trump-loving MAGA crowd, with Trumpian contempt for rule of law, love of the Big Lie, and desire for vengeance. Not a crowd whose politics I'd like to validate. In any case, there is no important distinction here between ginning them up to lock up an innocent person for political reasons and ginning them up so they'll vote for an election denier who will help Trump seek vengeance.

My claim is that she now speaks before such MAGA crowds frequently, feeding off their applause, and yes, enjoying it. And this will be the test of those "16 positions" which supposedly align with Dems. Right wing pundits are going over her record now, noting the very points you think make her "independent"; they'll be interviewing her about them. I'm saying let's see what she sticks with and what new positions she adopts.

The "fake links" do show endorsement of MAGA candidates before MAGA crowds, don't they? If you think they don't, why not? In what sense are they "fake." She feels "at home" speaking a CPAC, right?  

Sure she can "endorse" whomever she wants. No one was disputing that, right? So no need to "prove" it. The question is what her political choices now show about her politics. 

I.e., she is choosing to help the campaigns of election deniers, people who will be disrupting the upcoming midterms. If they get control of Congress, there's no chance those Dem "positions" she supposedly endorses will become law, including your Cuba policy discussed below. So she is recording her priorities with these endorsements.