Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eskridge is uncoverable here
#9
(02-21-2021, 02:43 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: I agree we have to have someone. But I think we have 4 right now. Some teams only carry 5. I like carrying 6.

Boyd, Higgins, Tate, and Morgan isn’t a bad start. We don’t have to add a day one or day two pick to fill out the back end of that group.

A team having three 1,000 yard WRs is pretty damn rare if I’m not mistaken. I expect Boyd and Higgins to be 1,000 yard guys.

Throwing the ball all over the place late in the season outdoors in the AFC North isn’t a recipe for success. Defense and a run game is.
You living in 1960?  It was 41 degrees and sunny the last game of the year....the olden days of 25 degrees and snow in December and early January are long gone.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-20-2021, 01:39 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 02:11 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 09:07 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 02:10 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - spazz70 - 02-21-2021, 01:05 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-22-2021, 10:17 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - Nati#1 - 02-21-2021, 04:12 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 09:08 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-22-2021, 09:21 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - Synric - 02-22-2021, 11:15 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-23-2021, 02:11 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - Synric - 02-23-2021, 02:06 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-23-2021, 06:05 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-23-2021, 06:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)