Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eskridge is uncoverable here
#11
(02-21-2021, 02:43 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: I agree we have to have someone. But I think we have 4 right now. Some teams only carry 5. I like carrying 6.

Boyd, Higgins, Tate, and Morgan isn’t a bad start. We don’t have to add a day one or day two pick to fill out the back end of that group.

A team having three 1,000 yard WRs is pretty damn rare if I’m not mistaken. I expect Boyd and Higgins to be 1,000 yard guys.

Throwing the ball all over the place late in the season outdoors in the AFC North isn’t a recipe for success. Defense and a run game is.
LOL we need more than back of the line WR's and Morgan hasn't proven a thing he can go as well. Tate is still unproven as well to TBH he has only shown flashes.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-20-2021, 01:39 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 02:11 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 09:07 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 02:10 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - spazz70 - 02-21-2021, 01:05 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 09:06 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-22-2021, 10:17 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - Nati#1 - 02-21-2021, 04:12 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-21-2021, 09:08 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-22-2021, 09:21 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - Synric - 02-22-2021, 11:15 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-23-2021, 02:11 AM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - Synric - 02-23-2021, 02:06 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-23-2021, 06:05 PM
RE: Eskridge is uncoverable here - pulses - 02-23-2021, 06:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)